Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10105F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10105F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900KF is 233 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-10105F.
Advantages of Core i3-10105F
- Up to 69% cheaper than Core i9-12900KF - $84.39 vs $269.95
- Up to 67% better value when playing Battlefield 1 than Core i9-12900KF - $0.35 vs $1.05 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Core i9-12900KF
- Performs up to 6% better in Battlefield 1 than Core i3-10105F - 258 vs 243 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105F - 24 vs 8 threads
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
243
94%
Value, $/FPS
$0.35/FPS
100%
Price, $
$84.39
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $84.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 113 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
258
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.05/FPS
33%
Price, $
$269.95
31%
FPS Winner
Buy for $269.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 114 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-10105F | vs | Core i9-12900KF |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |