Key Differences
In short — Core i7-14700K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10105F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10105F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-14700K is 945 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-10105F.
Advantages of Core i3-10105F
- Up to 74% cheaper than Core i7-14700K - $86.30 vs $328.95
- Up to 68% better value when playing Minecraft than Core i7-14700K - $0.12 vs $0.37 per FPS
Advantages of Core i7-14700K
- Performs up to 26% better in Minecraft than Core i3-10105F - 895 vs 713 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105F - 28 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-10105F doesn't have integrated graphics
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
713
80%
Value, $/FPS
$0.12/FPS
100%
Price, $
$86.3
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $86.3 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7260 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
895
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.37/FPS
32%
Price, $
$328.95
26%
FPS Winner
Buy for $328.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7259 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-10105F | vs | Core i7-14700K |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 20 |
8 | Threads | 28 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |