In Control, the Core i3-10105 is same performance as the Core i7-10700F. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $195 cheaper!
Core i3-10105
- Is 10 months and 15 days newer – Mar 16, 2021 vs Apr 30, 2020
- Is 10 months and 15 days newer
- Up to 59% cheaper – $134.94 vs $329.95
- Up to 59% cheaper
- Up to 59% better value in Control – $0.54 vs $1.31/FPS
- Up to 59% better value in Control
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i7-10700F
No clear advantages
Control FPS Calculator
Core i3-10105 vs Core i7-10700F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-10105
Mar 16th, 2021
Average FPS
249 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
163 FPS
100%
Price, $
$134.94
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.54/FPS
100%
Core i7-10700F
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
250 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
163 FPS
100%
Price, $
$329.95
40%
Value, $/FPS
$1.31/FPS
41%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-10105 vs Core i7-10700F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-10105 vs Core i7-10700F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-10105
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
6 MB
38%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
92%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
91%
Core i7-10700F
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
78%
Turbo Frequency
4.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-10105 Mar 16th, 2021 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-10700F Apr 30th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Mar 16th, 2021 | Released | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| $122.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | LGA1200 |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2933 MHz (DDR4) |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
