In Control, the Core i7-10700F is slightly slower than the Core Ultra 7 265KF and it's also a slightly worse value for money, as it's $31 more expensive!
Core i7-10700F
- Consumes up to 48% less energy – 65 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 48% less energy
Core Ultra 7 265KF
- Up to 2% faster in Control – 255 vs 250 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in Control
- Is 4 years and 5 months newer – Oct 24, 2024 vs Apr 30, 2020
- Is 4 years and 5 months newer
- Up to 9% cheaper – $298.98 vs $329.95
- Up to 9% cheaper
- Up to 11% better value in Control – $1.17 vs $1.31/FPS
- Up to 11% better value in Control
Control FPS Calculator
Core i7-10700F vs Core Ultra 7 265KF: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-10700F
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
250 FPS
98%
Min 1% FPS
163 FPS
98%
Price, $
$329.95
90%
Value, $/FPS
$1.31/FPS
89%
Core Ultra 7 265KF
Oct 24th, 2024
Average FPS
255 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
167 FPS
100%
Price, $
$298.98
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.17/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-10700F vs Core Ultra 7 265KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-10700F vs Core Ultra 7 265KF in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-10700F
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
8-core
40%
L3 Cache
16 MB
53%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
74%
Turbo Frequency
4.8 GHz
87%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
46%
Core Ultra 7 265KF
Oct 24th, 2024
Cores
20-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-10700F Apr 30th, 2020 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 7 265KF Oct 24th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 30th, 2020 | Released | Oct 24th, 2024 |
| – | MSRP | $379.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | LGA1851 |
65 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2933 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
