The Core i3-10105 is a clear winner – it's a faster gaming CPU than the Core i3-8100 and it's also a better value for money, as it's $20.70 cheaper!
Advantages of the Core i3-10105
- A faster CPU for gaming
- Up to 20% cheaper – $84.99 vs $105.69
- A better value for money for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of the Core i3-8100
The Core i3-10105 is better in every way
Core i3-10105 vs Core i3-8100 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i3-10105
Mar 16th, 2021
Average FPS
187
100%
Min 1% FPS
124
100%
Price, $
$84.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.45/FPS
100%
Core i3-8100
Oct 5th, 2017
Average FPS
183
98%
Min 1% FPS
122
98%
Price, $
$105.69
80%
Value, $/FPS
$0.57/FPS
79%
Core i3-10105 vs Core i3-8100 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-10105 vs Core i3-8100 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-10105 vs Core i3-8100 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-10105
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Core i3-8100
Oct 5th, 2017
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
97%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
90%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i3-10105 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i3-8100 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Oct 5th, 2017 |
$122.00 | MSRP | $117.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
65 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
Performance | ||
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.7 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.6 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Frequency | Non-Turbo |
6 MB | L3 Cache | 6 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR4 @ 2666 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 2400 MHz |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |