Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900KF outperforms the cheaper Celeron G6900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G6900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900KF is 651 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G6900.
Advantages of Celeron G6900
- Up to 88% cheaper than Core i9-14900KF - $49.99 vs $417.61
- Up to 86% better value when playing God of War than Core i9-14900KF - $0.28 vs $2.07 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i9-14900KF
- Performs up to 14% better in God of War than Celeron G6900 - 202 vs 177 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 32 vs 2 threads
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
177
88%
Value, $/FPS
$0.28/FPS
100%
Price, $
$49.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $49.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 112 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
202
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.07/FPS
14%
Price, $
$417.61
11%
FPS Winner
Buy for $417.61 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 112 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G6900 | vs | Core i9-14900KF |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
2 | Threads | 32 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | Not Available |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
UHD Graphics 710 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |