Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G6900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G6900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-13700K is 266 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G6900.
Advantages of Celeron G6900
- Up to 84% cheaper than Core i7-13700K - $49.99 vs $319.98
- Up to 81% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i7-13700K - $0.45 vs $2.39 per FPS
Advantages of Core i7-13700K
- Performs up to 22% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Celeron G6900 - 134 vs 110 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 24 vs 2 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
110
82%
Value, $/FPS
$0.45/FPS
100%
Price, $
$49.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $49.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 192 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
134
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.39/FPS
19%
Price, $
$319.98
15%
FPS Winner
Buy for $319.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 192 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G6900 | vs | Core i7-13700K |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
2 | Threads | 24 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
UHD Graphics 710 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |