Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 3700X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 3700X is 460 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Celeron G4900
- Up to 77% cheaper than Ryzen 7 3700X - $29.29 vs $129.29
- Up to 75% better value when playing World of Tanks than Ryzen 7 3700X - $0.06 vs $0.24 per FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 3700X - 54 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 3700X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 7 3700X
- Performs up to 6% better in World of Tanks than Celeron G4900 - 542 vs 509 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 16 vs 2 threads
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
509
94%
Value, $/FPS
$0.06/FPS
100%
Price, $
$29.29
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $29.29 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 103 minutes ago
Buy for $129.29 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 104 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G4900 | vs | Ryzen 7 3700X |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |