In Battlefield 6, the Celeron G4900 is quite a bit slower than the Ryzen 7 5700X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Celeron G4900
- Consumes up to 17% less energy – 54 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 17% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Ryzen 7 5700X
- Up to 64% faster in Battlefield 6 – 100 vs 61 FPS
- Up to 64% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 4 years and 1 day newer – Apr 04, 2022 vs Apr 03, 2018
- Is 4 years and 1 day newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Celeron G4900 vs Ryzen 7 5700X: Comparison of performance and price
Celeron G4900
Apr 3rd, 2018
Average FPS
61 FPS
61%
Min 1% FPS
46 FPS
61%
Price, $
$29.52
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.48/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron G4900 vs Ryzen 7 5700X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron G4900 vs Ryzen 7 5700X in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron G4900
Apr 3rd, 2018
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
2 MB
6%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
91%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
75%
Ryzen 7 5700X
Apr 4th, 2022
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
32 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Celeron G4900 Apr 3rd, 2018 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 7 5700X Apr 4th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 3rd, 2018 | Released | Apr 4th, 2022 |
$42.00 | MSRP | $299.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | AM4 |
54 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4) |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
