The Celeron G1610 is at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core i9-9900, however, it's a better value for money, as it's $242.00 cheaper!
Advantages of the Celeron G1610
- Up to 83% cheaper – $49.00 vs $291.00
- A better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 15% less energy – 55 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of the Core i9-9900
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 16 vs 2 threads
Celeron G1610 vs Core i9-9900
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron G1610 vs Core i9-9900 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron G1610 vs Core i9-9900 in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron G1610
Dec 3rd, 2012
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
2 MB
12%
Base Frequency
2.6 GHz
84%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i9-9900
Apr 23rd, 2019
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Celeron G1610 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i9-9900 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $423.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake-R |
55 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Performance | ||
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 2 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.6 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.1 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Frequency | 5.0 GHz |
| 2 MB | L3 Cache | 16 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | DDR4 @ 2666 MHz |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
