Skip to main content
CPU Comparison: FPS, Specs & Value

Celeron G1610 vs Core Ultra 7 265K

The Celeron G1610 is slower than the Core Ultra 7 265K on average across 100+ games. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $321.35 cheaper!

  • Up to 19% faster on average across 100+ games
  • Is 12 years and 1 month newer
  • Available for $345.99

FPS Comparison Across Popular Games

Predicted average FPS at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K, based on real game benchmarks.

Specs & Benchmark Comparison

Side-by-side specs, synthetic benchmarks, and key hardware differences.

Scorehelp

Core Ultra 7 265K ranks 16 points higher.

Coreshelp

Core Ultra 7 265K has 18 more cores.

Threadshelp

Core Ultra 7 265K has 18 more threads.

L3 Cachehelp

Core Ultra 7 265K has 28 MB more L3 cache.

Base Frequencyhelp

Core Ultra 7 265K has a 50% higher base clock.

Turbo Frequencyhelp
TDPhelp

Celeron G1610 draws 70W less power.

Pricehelp

Celeron G1610 is $321.35 cheaper.

LGA1155
Sockethelp
LGA1851
Ivy Bridge
Codenamehelp
Arrow Lake-S
Desktop
Segmenthelp
Desktop
Intel HD
Integrated GPUhelp
Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU
DDR3
RAMhelp
6400 MHz (DDR5)
Not Overclockable
Overclock Supporthelp
Overclockable

Frequently Asked Questions

compare_arrowsWhich is better, Celeron G1610 or Core Ultra 7 265K?expand_more
The Core Ultra 7 265K. It's 35% faster than the Celeron G1610 on average across 100+ games, scoring 62/100 vs 46/100 in our gaming rating.
speedHow much faster is Core Ultra 7 265K than Celeron G1610?expand_more
35% faster on average. The gap varies by game and resolution, check the per-game FPS comparison above.
aspect_ratioWhich is better for 1440p and 4K gaming, Celeron G1610 or Core Ultra 7 265K?expand_more
The Core Ultra 7 265K is faster at both resolutions. Toggle the resolution selector above to see per-game FPS.
paidIs the Core Ultra 7 265K worth buying in 2026?expand_more
It scores 62/100 in our gaming rating, faster than most CPUs on the market. Good buy if the price is right.
differenceWhat is the difference between Celeron G1610 and Core Ultra 7 265K?expand_more
Performance: Celeron G1610 scores 46/100, Core Ultra 7 265K scores 62/100. They also differ in core count, clock speeds, L3 cache, and power draw. Full breakdown in the specs section above.
compressWill the Celeron G1610 or Core Ultra 7 265K bottleneck my PC?expand_more
Depends on the rest of your build, especially your GPU. Swap the paired GPU in the FPS section above to see if it limits performance, or use our bottleneck calculator for a full analysis.
upgradeIs it worth upgrading to the Celeron G1610 or Core Ultra 7 265K?expand_more
The Core Ultra 7 265K is the stronger pick at 62/100. Compare your current CPU against it to see the exact FPS gain across 100+ games.

Popular Comparisons

Why Is My PC Slow?

Join thousands of gamers already benchmarking their rigs.

Download HowManyFPS

Windows 10/11, under 50 MB, always free

Spot BottlenecksBoost FPS100+ Games