Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12600KF outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1610 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-12600KF is 3258 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Celeron G1610
- Up to 74% cheaper than Core i5-12600KF - $37.00 vs $143.81
- Up to 69% better value when playing Valorant than Core i5-12600KF - $0.05 vs $0.16 per FPS
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than Intel Core i5-12600KF - 55 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-12600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i5-12600KF
- Performs up to 34% better in Valorant than Celeron G1610 - 911 vs 681 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 16 vs 2 threads
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for $37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7307 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
911
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.16/FPS
31%
Price, $
$143.81
25%
FPS Winner
Buy for $143.81 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7307 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1610 | vs | Core i5-12600KF |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |