Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX is 1288 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
- Performs up to 17% better in Horizon Zero Dawn than Celeron G3930 - 181 vs 155 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 32 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Up to 88% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX - $98.02 vs $810.0
- Up to 86% better value when playing Horizon Zero Dawn than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX - $0.63 vs $4.48 per FPS
- Consumes up to 82% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX - 51 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Horizon Zero Dawn
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultimate
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
FPS
181
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.48/FPS
14%
Price, $
$810
12%
FPS Winner
Buy for $810 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10084 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
155
85%
Value, $/FPS
$0.63/FPS
100%
Price, $
$98.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $98.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10080 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultimate
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX | vs | Intel Celeron G3930 |
---|---|---|
Jul 14th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Celeron |
Castle Peak | Codename | Kaby Lake |
AMD Socket WRX8 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 2 |
32 | Threads | 2 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
280 W | TDP | 51 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |