Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900F outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 3970X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-11900F is 477 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 3970X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-11900F - 64 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900F
- Performs up to 6% better in Battlefield IV than Ryzen Threadripper 3970X - 452 vs 426 FPS
- Up to 85% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 3970X - $229.99 vs $1515.0
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X - 65 vs 280 Watts
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
FPS
426
94.24778761061947%
Value, $/FPS
Price, $
$1515
15%
Buy for $1,515 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 36 minutes ago
Buy for $229.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 35 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Single-Core
1636
75.35697835099032%
Multi-Core
14008
100%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X | vs | Intel Core i9-11900F |
---|---|---|
Nov 25th, 2019 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i9 |
Castle Peak | Codename | Rocket Lake |
AMD Socket TRX4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 8 |
64 | Threads | 16 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
280 W | TDP | 65 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |