Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900F outperforms the more expensive Xeon E5-2699A v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-11900F is 1603 days newer than the more expensive Xeon E5-2699A v4.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900F
- Performs up to 5% better in Battlefield 1 than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 252 vs 239 FPS
- Up to 86% cheaper than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - $229.99 vs $1595.95
- Consumes up to 55% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 65 vs 145 Watts
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-11900F - 44 vs 16 threads
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $229.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 147 minutes ago
Buy for $1,595.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 146 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-11900F | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Oct 25th, 2016 |
Core i9 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Broadwell |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 22 |
16 | Threads | 44 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 145 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |