Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900KF outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900KF is 626 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10900KF - 64 vs 20 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900KF
- Performs up to 6% better in Battlefield V than Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX - 252 vs 237 FPS
- Up to 76% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX - $249.0 vs $1059.22
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX - 125 vs 250 Watts
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 13th, 2018
FPS
237
94.04761904761905%
Value, $/FPS
Price, $
$1059.22
23%
Buy for $1,059.22 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75510 minutes ago
Buy for $249 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75509 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 13th, 2018
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Aug 13th, 2018
Single-Core
1180
66.93136698808848%
Multi-Core
7221
78.8835481756609%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX | vs | Intel Core i9-10900KF |
---|---|---|
Aug 13th, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i9 |
Colfax | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 10 |
64 | Threads | 20 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
250 W | TDP | 125 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |