Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX outperforms the cheaper Pentium G4400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G4400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX is 1127 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G4400.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
- Performs up to 35% better in FIFA 23 than Pentium G4400 - 148 vs 110 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G4400 - 48 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium G4400
- Up to 87% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - $95.31 vs $725.0
- Up to 82% better value when playing FIFA 23 than Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - $0.87 vs $4.9 per FPS
- Consumes up to 78% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - 54 vs 250 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX doesn't have integrated graphics
FIFA 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 2nd, 2018
FPS
148
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.9/FPS
17.755102040816325%
Price, $
$725
13%
FPS Winner
Buy for $725 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3839 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
110
74.32432432432432%
Value, $/FPS
$0.87/FPS
100%
Price, $
$95.31
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $95.31 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3837 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 2nd, 2018
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
694
56.19433198380567%
Multi-Core
1184
15.98487916835426%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX | vs | Intel Pentium G4400 |
---|---|---|
Oct 2nd, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Pentium |
Colfax | Codename | Skylake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 2 |
48 | Threads | 2 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
250 W | TDP | 54 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |