Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-10900F outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2950X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-10900F is 608 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2950X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10900F - 32 vs 20 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 11% better in Dead Island 2 than Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - 164 vs 148 FPS
- Up to 77% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - $244.0 vs $1075.0
- Up to 79% better value when playing Dead Island 2 than Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - $1.49 vs $7.26 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - 65 vs 180 Watts
Dead Island 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $1,075 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 178 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
164
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.49/FPS
100%
Price, $
$244
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $244 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 178 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2018
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
Aug 31st, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i9 |
Colfax | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 10 |
32 | Threads | 20 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 65 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |