Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-11900 outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1950X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-11900 is 1314 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Up to 18% cheaper than Core i9-11900 - $221.76 vs $270.0
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-11900 - 32 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900
- Performs up to 23% better in Rust than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 228 vs 185 FPS
- Up to 2% better value when playing Rust than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $1.18 vs $1.2 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
185
81%
Value, $/FPS
$1.2/FPS
98%
Price, $
$221.76
100%
Buy for $221.76 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7496 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
228
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.18/FPS
100%
Price, $
$270
82%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $270 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7496 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X | vs | Intel Core i9-11900 |
---|---|---|
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i9 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Rocket Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 8 |
32 | Threads | 16 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |