Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-8600K outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-8600K is 56 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-8600K - 32 vs 6 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-8600K
- Performs up to 3% better in Halo Infinite than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 162 vs 158 FPS
- Up to 78% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $125.0 vs $576.53
- Up to 79% better value when playing Halo Infinite than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $0.77 vs $3.65 per FPS
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 95 vs 180 Watts
Halo Infinite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
158
97%
Value, $/FPS
$3.65/FPS
21%
Price, $
$576.53
21%
Buy for $576.53 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 166 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
FPS
162
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.77/FPS
100%
Price, $
$125
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $125 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 165 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X | vs | Intel Core i5-8600K |
---|---|---|
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 5th, 2017 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i5 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 6 |
32 | Threads | 6 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |