Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12600 outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-12600 is 1629 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-12600 - 32 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12600
- Performs up to 15% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 208 vs 181 FPS
- Up to 74% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $165.48 vs $624.95
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
181
87.01923076923077%
Value, $/FPS
Price, $
$624.95
26%
Buy for $624.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 181 minutes ago
Buy for $165.48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 180 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Single-Core
1171
49.388443694643605%
Multi-Core
7539
77.55374961423722%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X | vs | Intel Core i5-12600 |
---|---|---|
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i5 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 6 |
32 | Threads | 12 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |