Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6700T outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1920X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-6700T is 709 days older than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1920X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-6700T - 24 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700T
- Performs up to 1% better in Marvel’s Spider-Man Remastered than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 91 vs 90 FPS
- Up to 53% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - $111.11 vs $235.0
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 35 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Marvel’s Spider-Man Remastered
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for $235 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 50 minutes ago
Buy for $111.11 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 50 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Single-Core
1174
99.23922231614539%
Multi-Core
6976
100%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X | vs | Intel Core i7-6700T |
---|---|---|
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i7 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Skylake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 4 |
24 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |