Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900K outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900K is 1526 days newer than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900K
- Performs up to 18% better in Battlefield IV than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 474 vs 403 FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 125 vs 180 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 24 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $298.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75008 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Single-Core
1168
44.58015267175573%
Multi-Core
5794
37.51375849789576%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X | vs | Intel Core i9-12900K |
---|---|---|
Aug 31st, 2017 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i9 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 16 |
16 | Threads | 24 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |