Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 1952 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Up to 88% cheaper than Core i5-13400F - $109.99 vs $899.99
- Up to 82% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Core i5-13400F - $0.33 vs $1.84 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 47% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 488 vs 332 FPS
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
332
68%
Value, $/FPS
$0.33/FPS
100%
Price, $
$109.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $109.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8451 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
488
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.84/FPS
17%
Price, $
$899.99
12%
FPS Winner
Buy for $899.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8450 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X | vs | Intel Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Aug 31st, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i5 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 10 |
16 | Threads | 16 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
180 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |