Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2950X outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2950X is 365 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Up to 90% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - $109.99 vs $1075.0
- Up to 90% better value when playing War Thunder than Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - $0.66 vs $6.29 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
- Performs up to 3% better in War Thunder than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 171 vs 166 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 32 vs 16 threads
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
166
97%
Value, $/FPS
$0.66/FPS
100%
Price, $
$109.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $109.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8571 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2018
FPS
171
100%
Value, $/FPS
$6.29/FPS
10%
Price, $
$1075
10%
FPS Winner
Buy for $1,075 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8571 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X |
---|---|---|
Aug 31st, 2017 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2018 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Whitehaven | Codename | Colfax |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 16 |
16 | Threads | 32 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |