Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 2150 days newer than FX-6100.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Performs up to 53% better in The Callisto Protocol than FX-6100 - 104 vs 68 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6100 - 16 vs 6 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 95 vs 180 Watts
The Callisto Protocol
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $29.65 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 137 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X | vs | AMD FX-6100 |
---|---|---|
Aug 31st, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | FX |
Whitehaven | Codename | Zambezi |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 6 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |