Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7900X outperforms Xeon E5-2667 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7900X is 2941 days newer than Xeon E5-2667 v3.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7900X
- Performs up to 14% better in World of Tanks than Xeon E5-2667 v3 - 590 vs 518 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 - 24 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3
- Consumes up to 21% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7900X - 135 vs 170 Watts
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen 9 7900X
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Xeon E5-2667 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 |
|---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Ryzen 9 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Raphael | Codename | Gainestown, Haswell-E/EP, Ivy Bridge, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX |
| AMD Socket AM5 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
12 | Cores | 8 |
24 | Threads | 8 |
4.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 170 W | TDP | 135 W |
5 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
47.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Radeon Graphics | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
