Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7900X outperforms Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7900X is 3585 days newer than Celeron G1620.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7900X
- Performs up to 26% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Celeron G1620 - 194 vs 154 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 24 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Consumes up to 68% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7900X - 55 vs 170 Watts
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
194
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.02/FPS
100%
Price, $
$391
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $391 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 149 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X | vs | Intel Celeron G1620 |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | Celeron |
Raphael | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
AMD Socket AM5 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 2 |
24 | Threads | 2 |
4.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
170 W | TDP | 55 W |
5 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
47.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
Radeon Graphics | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
Yes | Overclockable | No |