Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 5600 outperforms Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 5600 is 3425 days newer than Celeron G1620.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 5600
- Performs up to 10% better in World of Tanks than Celeron G1620 - 555 vs 503 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 5600 - 55 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 5600 doesn't have integrated graphics
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 20th, 2022
FPS
555
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.23/FPS
100%
Price, $
$125
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $125 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 32 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 20th, 2022
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 5600 | vs | Intel Celeron G1620 |
---|---|---|
Apr 20th, 2022 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Celeron |
Vermeer | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 55 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
Yes | Overclockable | No |