Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7900X outperforms FX-4350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7900X is 3438 days newer than FX-4350.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7900X
- Performs up to 31% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than FX-4350 - 220 vs 168 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4350 - 24 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-4350
- Consumes up to 26% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7900X - 125 vs 170 Watts
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
220
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.78/FPS
100%
Price, $
$390.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $390.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 156 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X | vs | AMD FX-4350 |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | FX |
Raphael | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket AM5 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 4 |
24 | Threads | 4 |
4.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
170 W | TDP | 125 W |
5 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
47.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
Radeon Graphics | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |