Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900K outperforms FX-4350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900K is 3111 days newer than FX-4350.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900K
- Performs up to 27% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than FX-4350 - 214 vs 168 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4350 - 24 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Core i9-12900K
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FX-4350
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-12900K | vs | AMD FX-4350 |
|---|---|---|
Nov 4th, 2021 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
| Core i9 | Collection | FX |
| Alder Lake | Codename | Vishera |
| Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 4 |
24 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
| 125 W | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
