Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5900X outperforms Xeon E5-2609 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 5900X is 2250 days newer than Xeon E5-2609 v3.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
- Performs up to 7% better in Monster Hunter: World than Xeon E5-2609 v3 - 268 vs 251 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2609 v3 - 24 vs 6 threads
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2609 v3
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 5900X - 85 vs 105 Watts
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
268
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.98/FPS
100%
Price, $
$261.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $261.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 206 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2609 v3 |
---|---|---|
Nov 5th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Vermeer | Codename | Haswell-E/EP, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
12 | Cores | 6 |
24 | Threads | 6 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 1.9 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
105 W | TDP | 85 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |