Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 7800X3D outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 1950X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 7800X3D is 1973 days newer than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D
- Performs up to 22% better in No Man's Sky than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 207 vs 170 FPS
- Consumes up to 33% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 120 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D - 32 vs 16 threads
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
170
82.1256038647343%
Value, $/FPS
Price, $
$819.3
100%
Buy for $819.3 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 73922 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Single-Core
1171
43.06730415593968%
Multi-Core
7539
49.69021882414975%
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Ryzen 7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Raphael | Codename | Whitehaven |
AMD Socket AM5 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 16 |
16 | Threads | 32 |
4.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
120 W | TDP | 180 W |
5 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
42.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Radeon Graphics | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |