Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 5700X3D outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 5700X3D is 2561 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D
- Performs up to 11% better in F1 22 than Celeron G3930 - 283 vs 256 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 16 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Up to 89% cheaper than Ryzen 7 5700X3D - $26.99 vs $236.99
- Up to 87% better value when playing F1 22 than Ryzen 7 5700X3D - $0.11 vs $0.84 per FPS
- Consumes up to 51% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D - 51 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D doesn't have integrated graphics
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
283
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.84/FPS
13%
Price, $
$236.99
11%
FPS Winner
Buy for $236.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 28 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
256
90%
Value, $/FPS
$0.11/FPS
100%
Price, $
$26.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $26.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 28 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D | vs | Intel Celeron G3930 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Ryzen 7 | Collection | Celeron |
Not Available | Codename | Kaby Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
105 W | TDP | 51 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |