Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 5600 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 5600 is 1933 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 5600
- Performs up to 9% better in World of Tanks than Celeron G3930 - 555 vs 509 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Up to 46% cheaper than Ryzen 5 5600 - $63.92 vs $118.99
- Up to 38% better value when playing World of Tanks than Ryzen 5 5600 - $0.13 vs $0.21 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 5600 - 51 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 5600 doesn't have integrated graphics
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $118.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 89 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
509
91%
Value, $/FPS
$0.13/FPS
100%
Price, $
$63.92
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $63.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 88 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 20th, 2022
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 5600 | vs | Intel Celeron G3930 |
---|---|---|
Apr 20th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Celeron |
Vermeer | Codename | Kaby Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 51 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |