Key Differences
In short — Core i7-14700KF outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-14700KF is 2478 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Celeron G3930
- Up to 78% cheaper than Core i7-14700KF - $70.40 vs $319.99
- Up to 77% better value when playing Control than Core i7-14700KF - $0.35 vs $1.54 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-14700KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i7-14700KF
- Performs up to 5% better in Control than Celeron G3930 - 208 vs 199 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 28 vs 2 threads
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
199
96%
Value, $/FPS
$0.35/FPS
100%
Price, $
$70.4
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $70.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7109 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
208
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.54/FPS
23%
Price, $
$319.99
22%
FPS Winner
Buy for $319.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7108 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G3930 | vs | Core i7-14700KF |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 20 |
2 | Threads | 28 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
51 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |