Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 5700X3D outperforms the cheaper FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 5700X3D is 4094 days newer than the cheaper FX-6300.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D
- Performs up to 25% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than FX-6300 - 188 vs 151 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6300 - 16 vs 6 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Up to 75% cheaper than Ryzen 7 5700X3D - $58.02 vs $230.0
- Up to 69% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Ryzen 7 5700X3D - $0.38 vs $1.22 per FPS
- Consumes up to 10% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D - 95 vs 105 Watts
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $230 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 54 minutes ago
Buy for $58.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 55 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D | vs | AMD FX-6300 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Ryzen 7 | Collection | FX |
Not Available | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 6 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
105 W | TDP | 95 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |