Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 5600G outperforms the cheaper FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 5600G is 3094 days newer than the cheaper FX-6300.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 5600G
- Performs up to 84% better in Counter-Strike 2 than FX-6300 - 435 vs 237 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-6300 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6300 - 12 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Up to 59% cheaper than Ryzen 5 5600G - $58.02 vs $139.98
- Up to 25% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Ryzen 5 5600G - $0.24 vs $0.32 per FPS
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 13th, 2021
FPS
435
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.32/FPS
75%
Price, $
$139.98
41%
FPS Winner
Buy for $139.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 92 minutes ago
Buy for $58.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 91 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 13th, 2021
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 5600G | vs | AMD FX-6300 |
---|---|---|
Apr 13th, 2021 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | FX |
Cezanne | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 6 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
Radeon Vega 7 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |