Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 4800HS outperforms Core i5-9400F on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 4800HS is 363 days newer than Core i5-9400F.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS
- Performs up to 1% better in Dead Space than Core i5-9400F - 152 vs 151 FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-9400F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9400F - 16 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-9400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $96 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5518 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS | vs | Intel Core i5-9400F |
---|---|---|
Jan 6th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Ryzen 7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Renoir | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket FP6 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 6 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Radeon Graphics 448SP | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |