Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9400F outperforms Ryzen 7 3750H on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-9400F is 2 days newer than Ryzen 7 3750H.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-9400F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9400F - 8 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-9400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Performs up to 5% better in Ready or Not than Ryzen 7 3750H - 266 vs 253 FPS
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
266
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.36/FPS
100%
Price, $
$96
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $96 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3572 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2019
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H | vs | Intel Core i5-9400F |
---|---|---|
Jan 6th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Ryzen 7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Picasso | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket FP5 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 6 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Radeon Vega 10 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |