Key Differences
In short — Core i3-7350K outperforms Ryzen 7 3750H on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-7350K is 733 days older than Ryzen 7 3750H.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than Intel Core i3-7350K - 35 vs 60 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7350K - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7350K
- Performs up to 4% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Ryzen 7 3750H - 168 vs 161 FPS
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
168
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.31/FPS
100%
Price, $
$51.6
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $51.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5003 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2019
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H | vs | Intel Core i3-7350K |
---|---|---|
Jan 6th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Ryzen 7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Picasso | Codename | Kaby Lake |
AMD Socket FP5 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 60 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
Radeon Vega 10 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |