Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 3700X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1610 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 3700X is 2407 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
- Performs up to 30% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Celeron G1610 - 226 vs 174 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 16 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 72% cheaper than Ryzen 7 3700X - $37.0 vs $129.98
- Up to 64% better value when playing Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Ryzen 7 3700X - $0.21 vs $0.58 per FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 3700X - 55 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 3700X doesn't have integrated graphics
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for $129.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 22 minutes ago
Buy for $37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 21 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Ryzen 7 | Collection | Celeron |
Matisse | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 55 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
Yes | Overclockable | No |