Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 3700X outperforms Celeron 847 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 3700X is 2940 days newer than Celeron 847.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
- Performs up to 19% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Celeron 847 - 192 vs 162 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 847 - 16 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron 847
- Consumes up to 74% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 3700X - 17 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 3700X doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
192
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.07/FPS
100%
Price, $
$205
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $205 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 41 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Mobile • Jun 19th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X | vs | Intel Celeron 847 |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Jun 19th, 2011 |
Ryzen 7 | Collection | Celeron |
Matisse | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel BGA 1023 |
Desktop | Segment | Mobile |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 1.1 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 17 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 11.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
Yes | Overclockable | No |