Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U outperforms FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U is 2268 days newer than FX-6300.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U
- Performs up to 1% better in Dead Space than FX-6300 - 147 vs 145 FPS
- Consumes up to 84% less energy than AMD FX-6300 - 15 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $74.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 31 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 8th, 2019
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U | vs | AMD FX-6300 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | FX |
Raven Ridge | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket FP5 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 6 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |