Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 4600U outperforms FX-8300 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 4600U is 2631 days newer than FX-8300.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 4600U
- Performs up to 11% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than FX-8300 - 186 vs 167 FPS
- Consumes up to 84% less energy than AMD FX-8300 - 15 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for $112.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6741 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2020
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 4600U | vs | AMD FX-8300 |
---|---|---|
Jan 6th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | FX |
Renoir | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket FP6 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 95 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
Radeon RX Vega 6 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |