Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 2600X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 2090 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600X
- Up to 81% cheaper than Core i9-14900F - $99.97 vs $529.99
- Up to 76% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i9-14900F - $0.59 vs $2.45 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 27% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Ryzen 5 2600X - 216 vs 170 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 2600X - 32 vs 12 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
170
78%
Value, $/FPS
$0.59/FPS
100%
Price, $
$99.97
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $99.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15601 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
216
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.45/FPS
24%
Price, $
$529.99
18%
FPS Winner
Buy for $529.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15599 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X | vs | Intel Core i9-14900F |
---|---|---|
Apr 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 24 |
12 | Threads | 32 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
95 W | TDP | Not Available |
12 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |