Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900KF outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 2500X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 2500X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9900KF is 120 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 2500X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2500X
- Up to 63% cheaper than Core i9-9900KF - $106.47 vs $290.0
- Up to 61% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Core i9-9900KF - $0.84 vs $2.13 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900KF - 65 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900KF
- Performs up to 7% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Ryzen 5 2500X - 136 vs 127 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 2500X - 16 vs 8 threads
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2018
FPS
127
93.38235294117648%
Value, $/FPS
$0.84/FPS
100%
Price, $
$106.47
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $106.47 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 32308 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
136
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.13/FPS
39.43661971830986%
Price, $
$290
36%
FPS Winner
Buy for $290 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 32308 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2018
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2018
Single-Core
1103
65.22767593140154%
Multi-Core
3801
47.19980131627965%
AMD Ryzen 5 2500X | vs | Intel Core i9-9900KF |
---|---|---|
Sep 10th, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |