Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KF outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 2500X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 2500X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900KF is 1478 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 2500X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2500X
- Up to 76% cheaper than Core i9-13900KF - $106.47 vs $434.99
- Up to 69% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Core i9-13900KF - $0.63 vs $2.03 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KF
- Performs up to 27% better in No Man's Sky than Ryzen 5 2500X - 214 vs 169 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 2500X - 32 vs 8 threads
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2018
FPS
169
78.97196261682244%
Value, $/FPS
$0.63/FPS
100%
Price, $
$106.47
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $106.47 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 32224 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
214
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.03/FPS
31.03448275862069%
Price, $
$434.99
24%
FPS Winner
Buy for $434.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 32229 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2018
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2018
Single-Core
1103
37.10057181298352%
Multi-Core
3801
18.909506989702006%
AMD Ryzen 5 2500X | vs | Intel Core i9-13900KF |
---|---|---|
Sep 10th, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |