Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 2500X outperforms the cheaper Core i5-3330 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-3330 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 2500X is 2198 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-3330.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2500X
- Performs up to 5% better in Elden Ring than Core i5-3330 - 118 vs 112 FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than Intel Core i5-3330 - 65 vs 77 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3330 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3330
- Up to 7% cheaper than Ryzen 5 2500X - $99.0 vs $106.47
- Up to 2% better value when playing Elden Ring than Ryzen 5 2500X - $0.88 vs $0.9 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 2500X doesn't have integrated graphics
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2018
FPS
118
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.9/FPS
97.77777777777777%
Price, $
$106.47
92%
FPS Winner
Buy for $106.47 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 32773 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
112
94.91525423728814%
Value, $/FPS
$0.88/FPS
100%
Price, $
$99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 32768 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2018
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
555
50.31731640979148%
Multi-Core
1643
43.225466982373064%
AMD Ryzen 5 2500X | vs | Intel Core i5-3330 |
---|---|---|
Sep 10th, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 77 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |