Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 2500X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3220 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3220 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 2500X is 2198 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3220.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2500X
- Performs up to 5% better in DOOM Eternal than Core i3-3220 - 476 vs 453 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3220 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3220
- Up to 14% cheaper than Ryzen 5 2500X - $91.98 vs $106.47
- Up to 9% better value when playing DOOM Eternal than Ryzen 5 2500X - $0.2 vs $0.22 per FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 2500X - 55 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 2500X doesn't have integrated graphics
DOOM Eternal
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2018
FPS
476
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.22/FPS
90.90909090909092%
Price, $
$106.47
86%
FPS Winner
Buy for $106.47 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 33326 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
453
95.16806722689076%
Value, $/FPS
$0.2/FPS
100%
Price, $
$91.98
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $91.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 33321 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2018
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 2500X | vs | Intel Core i3-3220 |
---|---|---|
Sep 10th, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 55 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |